DXG DXG-301V

65 anmeldelser

Feb 2025

Positivt
pris (37)
brugervenlighed (24)
batteri (12)
bærbar (12)
størrelse (9)

Negativt
billedkvalitet (21)
pålidelighed (12)
kvalitet (5)

Generelt overblik
Prissammenligning

alaTest har samlet og analyseret 65 anmeldelser fra magasiner og hjemmesider. Anmeldere kan virkelig godt lide muligheden for at medtage. Også brugervenligheden imponerer, men folk er mindre positive med hensyn til kvaliteten.

pris, brugervenlighed, bærbar, batteri, design

billedkvalitet, pålidelighed, kvalitet

Vi analyserede bruger- og ekspertratings, produktalder og andre faktorer. Sammenlignet med andre Videokameraer får DXG DXG-301V en samlet alaScore™ på 68/100 = God kvalitet.

Anmeldelsesanalyse

(Baseret på 65 anmeldelser)

Brugeranmeldelser

Anmdeldelsesratings

(14% af anmeldelser)
Viser alle 5 stjernede anmeldelser (37% af anmeldelser)
Viser alle 4 stjernede anmeldelser (8% af anmeldelser)
Viser alle 3 stjernede anmeldelser (8% af anmeldelser)
Viser alle 2 stjernede anmeldelser (34% af anmeldelser)
Viser alle 1 stjernede anmeldelser

Funktioner

pris
Vis positive (61%)Vis negative (39%)(Vis alle)

brugervenlighed
Vis positive (75%)Vis negative (25%)(Vis alle)

billedkvalitet
Vis positive (34%)Vis negative (66%)(Vis alle)

pålidelighed
Vis positive (25%)Vis negative (75%)(Vis alle)

bærbar
Vis positive (92%)Vis negative (8%)(Vis alle)

Vis flere funktioner

Viser 65 anmeldelse(r)

Ekspertanmeldelser Brugeranmeldelser

Disclaimer:

Herunder er en liste over anmeldelser for dette eller lignende produkter. Hvis du tror, denne gruppering er forkert klik her for at flag.
Læs mere på vores FAQ side.

Viser 1 - 65 af 65 Vis anmeldelser: på Dansk | på andre sprog

Brugeranmeldelse (amazon.com)

Amazon.com review summary for DXG DXG-301V

alaTest has collected and analyzed 62 user reviews of DXG DXG-301V from Amazon.com. The average user rating for this product is 2.9/5, compared to an average user rating of 3.9/5 for other Camcorders on Amazon.com. People really like the size and battery. The portability and usability also get good feedback. Some have doubts about the reliability and image quality. Views are divided on the durability.

price, usability, portability, battery, size

image quality, reliability

58% of the reviews on Amazon.com give this product a positive rating.

Feb 2025

Brugeranmeldelse (newegg.com)

very nice

I purchased this camera a few months ago and it is great. Very light weight and the picture quality is very nice. Even the video quality is pretty good. I'd reccommend this camera.

Nov 2004

Læs hele anmeldelsen

Brugeranmeldelse (photographyreview.com)

DXG Technology DXG-301V Digital

This is a post facto review, or in other words it was something I owned 3-4 years ago. The seeming replacement for Russian film cameras are the cheap Chinese imports, sold under various names, and no telling who really makes them. This is a...

Well, it ; s cheap. As they left the market some time ago they're scarce and sometimes people think they're sitting on a rarity ; The still image quality can be pretty good, but see below ; Uses AA batteries, NIMH or alkaline ; Fits your hand like a...

The video quality is more like a contemporary cell phone, and is atrocious. I think even the 320X240 is upsampled from a lower resolution as there are visible pixellation blocks. Details are smeared or blurred, and the camcorder needs lots of light ;...

Jul 2009

Læs hele anmeldelsen

Brugeranmeldelse (photographyreview.com)

DXG Technology DXG-301V Digital

I bought this camera a few months ago for casual use, mainly as a mini "camcorder." It's *not* a good camera, but fits the bill for something cheap and inobtrusive. The video quality at 320X240 is 30FPS, and the quality is something like first...

The 301V is very cheap, lasts a long time on 4AA batteries, and can record unimited video, up to 90 minutes, on a 512MB SD card. (I've used a 1GB in it). Fairly nice still pictures can be made with patience

The flash is weak and erratic under automatic seetings. Records videos in .asf format, which is MPEG4. Windows Media Player can work with it but Macs require VLC to play them. Videos are fair quality, there is no lens cap, and quality is overall fairly...

Aug 2005

Læs hele anmeldelsen